<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Cinematical</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com</link><description>Cinematical</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright><generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>Watch This: Darth Vader is a Smartass</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/09/11/watch-this-darth-vader-is-a-smartass/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/09/11/watch-this-darth-vader-is-a-smartass/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/09/11/watch-this-darth-vader-is-a-smartass/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/trailers-and-clips/" rel="tag">Trailers and Clips</a></p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5blbv4WFriM&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5blbv4WFriM&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br />Even though this clip is a little older and has been watched by over four million people, I'm sure there are some who've never seen it. Thus, this is for those people -- the unforgotten, the kids who've always lived their lives slightly behind the ball. Yes, you. Or you. Or him. Or her. Or me. Indeed, I'm just watching this for the first time as well. There's just something about the thought of Darth Vader pulling a stunt like this that just cracks me the hell up. But lets not throw too much love at this clip because, hey, 10 years from now <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/george-lucas/1144148/main">George Lucas</a> might want to remake the original <em>Star Wars</em> films and throw a scene like this in ... to lighten it all up. See, Vader's not that evil -- he's just a dick. Enjoy.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/09/11/watch-this-darth-vader-is-a-smartass/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1311132/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/09/11/watch-this-darth-vader-is-a-smartass/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>darth vader is a smartass</category><category>DarthVaderIsASmartass</category><category>george lucas</category><category>GeorgeLucas</category><category>star wars</category><category>StarWars</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Review: Star Wars: The Clone Wars</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/08/14/review-star-wars-the-clone-wars/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/08/14/review-star-wars-the-clone-wars/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/08/14/review-star-wars-the-clone-wars/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/Animation/" rel="tag">Animation</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/theatrical-reviews/" rel="tag">Theatrical Reviews</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p><img width="450" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="229" border="1" align="middle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/08/starwarsclonemain-(2).jpg" /><br /><br />If <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/star-wars-the-clone-wars/32885/main"><em>Star Wars: The Clone Wars</em> </a>were a simple board game stacked up in a toy store aisle, the side of the box would read: "Ages 7 through Check Your Star Wars Ego at the Door." While the recent onslaught of superhero movies have brought us darker, more complex (and adult) storylines, one of our most beloved franchises has decided to travel in the opposite direction. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing; it's actually somewhat comforting to find a film with the word 'Wars' mentioned twice in the title alone and know that it's suitable for all ages. When I first watched a <em>Star Wars </em>film on the big screen, my feet could barely touch the sticky theater floor -- and so if a fun-filled, action-packed animated adventure story helps usher in a whole new legion of fans -- subsequently turning younger kids on to three live-action movies that came out, like, a billion years ago -- then right friggin' on! <br /><br />Almost immediately we're clued into the fact that this big-screen <em>Star Wars</em> flick was gift-wrapped by another department store. That classic, drum-hoppin' 20th Century Fox intro is replaced with a much more subdued Warner Bros. logo, and the film's title swings into frame accompanied by different music. In replace of the classic story scroll, we get a newsreel-esque voiceover bringing us up to date on the main characters and their current mission. No one's trying to trick us here -- this is <em>Star Wars</em> for the need-it-now generation, and whereas previous films seemed to spend too much time rolling around in political-speak, <em>Clone Wars</em> is all about the action, the battles and the cheesy one-liners.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/08/14/review-star-wars-the-clone-wars/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Review: Star Wars: The Clone Wars</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/08/14/review-star-wars-the-clone-wars/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1284482/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/08/14/review-star-wars-the-clone-wars/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>anakin skywalker</category><category>AnakinSkywalker</category><category>cinematical</category><category>dave filoni</category><category>DaveFiloni</category><category>featured</category><category>obi-wan kenobi</category><category>Obi-wanKenobi</category><category>star wars</category><category>star wars the clone wars</category><category>star wars the clone wars review</category><category>StarWars</category><category>StarWarsTheCloneWars</category><category>StarWarsTheCloneWarsReview</category><category>the clone wars</category><category>TheCloneWars</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>George Lucas Talks 'Indiana Jones V'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/08/05/george-lucas-talks-indiana-jones-v/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/08/05/george-lucas-talks-indiana-jones-v/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/08/05/george-lucas-talks-indiana-jones-v/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/paramount/" rel="tag">Paramount</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/steven-spielberg/" rel="tag">Steven Spielberg</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p><img width="125" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="149" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2006/01/jones.JPG" alt="" />Less than three months ago, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/17/shia-labeouf-to-take-indy-franchise-forward/">Eugene told us</a> George Lucas was hinting that his <em>Indiana Jones </em>franchise might continue on with Mutt Williams (Shia LaBeouf) as the main character and that Indy (Harrison Ford) would be more of a secondary figure. But <a href="http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2008/08/05/exclusive-indiana-jones-5-wont-center-on-shia-labeouf-george-lucas-insists/">MTV Movies Blog now reports</a> that Lucas has had a change of mind and instead plans to make a fifth installment with our beloved hero still in the lead. During promotions for the new <em>Star Wars: Clone Wars </em>movie, he apparently stated that, "Indiana Jones is Indiana Jones. Harrison Ford IS Indiana Jones. If it was Mutt Williams it would be 'Mutt Williams and the Search for Elvis' or something."<br /><br />Could it be, as MTV suggests, that due to fans' dissatisfaction with Mutt and/or due to LaBeouf's problems with the law that Lucas no longer sees the character as a viable investment? Or did he merely come to his senses about how much more money the movie would make with Ford starring? Lucas says that "Indy 5" is still only an idea but that people are researching possible artifacts to base the movie around. Personally, I don't care what kind of MacGuffin is used, so long as the Nazis are the villains again. The commies in <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/25440/main">Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</a> </em>just didn't do it for me. I know the temporal setting can't be WWII anymore, but Indy could always head back into South America and battle the Nazis who escaped to Argentina and Brazil and elsewhere.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2008/08/05/exclusive-indiana-jones-5-wont-center-on-shia-labeouf-george-lucas-insists/>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/08/05/george-lucas-talks-indiana-jones-v/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1276397/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/08/05/george-lucas-talks-indiana-jones-v/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>george lucas</category><category>GeorgeLucas</category><category>harrison ford</category><category>HarrisonFord</category><category>indiana jones</category><category>indiana jones 5</category><category>indiana jones and the kingdom of the crystal skull</category><category>indiana jones V</category><category>IndianaJones</category><category>IndianaJones5</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull</category><category>IndianaJonesV</category><category>indy v</category><category>IndyV</category><category>shia labeouf</category><category>ShiaLabeouf</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Godiva Releases 'Twilight' Chocolate Bar</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/31/godiva-releases-twilight-chocolate-bar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/31/godiva-releases-twilight-chocolate-bar/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/31/godiva-releases-twilight-chocolate-bar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/romance/" rel="tag">Romance</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/harry-potter/" rel="tag">Harry Potter</a></p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="200" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/07/twilight_godiva_bar.jpg" />As both a cinephile and a candy freak, I get excited anytime there's a new movie-themed confection (as you can see from <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/10/14/cinematical-seven-movie-related-candy-to-hand-out-to-the-kids/">this Cinematical Seven</a> from last Halloween). While some tie-ins are less tasty than others -- it's no wonder that the movie theater I worked at had trouble pushing Bertie Bott's Every Flavor Beans at the concession stand -- everything is worth sampling. And from time to time, some candies, such as the <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/star-wars-episode-iv-a-new-hope/7512/main">Star Wars</a> </em>prequel-inspired dark chocolate M&amp;Ms and this summer's <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the/25440/main"><em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em></a>-themed Snickers Adventures Bar, end up being far better than the movie they're helping to market. <br /><br />Being apparently one of the few people who has no interest in <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/twilight/31347/main"><em>Twilight</em></a> whatsoever, I'm sure to feel the same way about a new tie-in from Godiva, which <a href="http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2008/07/30/take-a-bite-out-of-the-twilight-chocolate-bar/">MTV Movies Blog excitedly spotlighted this morning</a>. It's actually more related to the books, as its packaging features the cover of the first book in Stephanie Meyers' popular series. And Barnes and Noble will begin selling them tomorrow in connection with this weekend's release of the fourth book of the Twilight Saga, "Breaking Dawn." However, you could certainly stock up now (they're probably a limited edition item), so that you can sneak one into the cinema each of those hundreds of times you'll be sitting through <em>Twilight </em>the movie this December. Or maybe a smart theater chain will sell them at their concession stand, to avoid having fans smuggle in contraband candy (if you know me well, you know I don't like to encourage sneaking snacks). Keep in mind, though, that there's nothing entirely special about this bar, except that it has a special <em>Twilight</em>-themed sleeve. Otherwise it's just simply Godiva's boring (yet delicious) old milk chocolate bar.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2008/07/30/take-a-bite-out-of-the-twilight-chocolate-bar/>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/31/godiva-releases-twilight-chocolate-bar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1271973/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/31/godiva-releases-twilight-chocolate-bar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>bertie botts every ...</category><category>BertieBottsEvery...</category><category>breaking dawn</category><category>BreakingDawn</category><category>godiva chocolate</category><category>GodivaChocolate</category><category>indiana jones and the kingdom of the crystal skull</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull</category><category>mms</category><category>movie-themed candy</category><category>Movie-themedCandy</category><category>snickers adventure bar</category><category>SnickersAdventureBar</category><category>star wars prequels</category><category>StarWarsPrequels</category><category>stephanie meyers</category><category>StephanieMeyers</category><category>summit entertainment</category><category>SummitEntertainment</category><category>twilight</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Video of the Day: Indy Shot First!</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/07/video-of-the-day-indy-shot-first/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/07/video-of-the-day-indy-shot-first/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/07/video-of-the-day-indy-shot-first/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/steven-spielberg/" rel="tag">Steven Spielberg</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/trailers-and-clips/" rel="tag">Trailers and Clips</a></p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TQBLTB5f3j0&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TQBLTB5f3j0&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br />Fans of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082971/"><em>Raiders of the Lost Ark</em> </a>might want to look away right now as what you're about to watch could cause serious damage to your soul. A brief snippet from the upcoming <em>Raiders of the Lost Ark</em> Special Edition DVD has leaked online and, in it, there seems to be a little update from George Lucas. I kinda like the small touches added and think fans will get used to them after awhile. Yup, don't worry ... they'll just blend into the background. I mean, really, who cares about this old flick anyway? It's so ... 1981-ish. That said, I'm sure folks are already in the process of creating an "Indy Shot First" t-shirt. Check it out up top, then let us know what you think? Should we start a petition? Has Lucas lost his mind? And how could Spielberg agree to something like this? Sound off ...<br /><br />[Thanks Matthew]<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/07/video-of-the-day-indy-shot-first/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1247652/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/07/07/video-of-the-day-indy-shot-first/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>george lucas</category><category>GeorgeLucas</category><category>indiana jones</category><category>IndianaJones</category><category>indy shot first</category><category>IndyShotFirst</category><category>raiders of the lost ark</category><category>RaidersOfTheLostArk</category><category>steven spielberg</category><category>StevenSpielberg</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>George Lucas Testifies in Washington D.C. -- Yes, Really!</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/26/george-lucas-testifies-in-washington-d-c-yes-really/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/26/george-lucas-testifies-in-washington-d-c-yes-really/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/26/george-lucas-testifies-in-washington-d-c-yes-really/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/06/george-lucas-059.jpg" />This isn't exactly film news, but it was too odd not to share with <em>Cinematical</em>. I honestly thought it had originated at <em>The Onion</em>, and not with the AP! <br /><br />On Tuesday, George Lucas testified before the House subcommittee on telecommunications and the Internet. His intentions were really very admirable, as he was arguing in favor of reforming the universal service fund, which provides Internet and telephone access in rural, low-income, and high cost areas of the country. Lucas is passionate about education reform, and he testified in favor of making Internet access "a digital civil right," that is free to schools and libraries. <br /><br />While his intentions were good, the saga of Lucas and the subcommittee quickly became downright goofy. Several lawmakers took advantage of Lucas' appearance to crack <em>Star Wars</em> jokes. Rep. Mike Doyle declared "The universal service fund needs to be blown up like the Death Star," while Rep. Lee Terry compared himself and fellow Representative Rick Boucher to Luke Skywalker, and their opponents to Darth Vader. Our tax dollars at work, people.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/26/george-lucas-testifies-in-washington-d-c-yes-really/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>George Lucas Testifies in Washington D.C. -- Yes, Really!</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/26/george-lucas-testifies-in-washington-d-c-yes-really/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1237156/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/26/george-lucas-testifies-in-washington-d-c-yes-really/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>George Lucas</category><category>GeorgeLucas</category><category>House subcommittee</category><category>HouseSubcommittee</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>George Lucas NOT Directing 'Red Tails'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/19/george-lucas-not-directing-red-tails/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/19/george-lucas-not-directing-red-tails/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/19/george-lucas-not-directing-red-tails/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/steven-spielberg/" rel="tag">Steven Spielberg</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/war/" rel="tag">War</a></p><img width="136" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="150" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/03/georgelucas.jpg" alt="" />Just to clear up, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/george-lucas/1144148/main">George Lucas</a> is not directing his first non-<em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/star-wars-episode-iv-a-new-hope/7512/main">Star Wars</a> </em>movie in 35 years. I repeat, George Lucas is not returning to the director's chair. Once again ... never mind, I think you've got it.<br /><br />Two days ago there was an AP story about Lucasfilm's Tuskegee Airmen film, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/red-tails/30996/main"><em>Red Tails</em></a> -- perhaps you caught <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/17/george-lucas-wwii-movie-moves-forward/">my post</a> -- but it didn't note what Lucas' involvement would be. As I wrote, the article seemed to assume that he was directing the project. A number of sites around the web also treated the news (more like an update) as if it claimed that Lucas was indeed helming the WWII-set picture. Others speculated that he was taking the reigns. Well, he's not. He's merely serving as executive producer. There is no director signed on yet.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/19/george-lucas-not-directing-red-tails/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>George Lucas NOT Directing 'Red Tails'</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://weblogs.variety.com/thompsononhollywood/2008/06/lucas-is-not-re.html>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/19/george-lucas-not-directing-red-tails/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1230106/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/19/george-lucas-not-directing-red-tails/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>charles floyd johnson</category><category>CharlesFloydJohnson</category><category>george lucas</category><category>GeorgeLucas</category><category>john ridley</category><category>JohnRidley</category><category>lucasfilm</category><category>red tails</category><category>RedTails</category><category>rick mccallum</category><category>RickMccallum</category><category>steven spielberg</category><category>StevenSpielberg</category><category>tuskegee airmen</category><category>TuskegeeAirmen</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Paramount Boasts Billion Dollar B.O. Overseas</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/17/paramount-boasts-billion-dollar-b-o-overseas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/17/paramount-boasts-billion-dollar-b-o-overseas/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/17/paramount-boasts-billion-dollar-b-o-overseas/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/paramount/" rel="tag">Paramount</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/distribution/" rel="tag">Distribution</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/dreamworks/" rel="tag">Dreamworks</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/steven-spielberg/" rel="tag">Steven Spielberg</a></p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="151" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/paramountlogo.jpg" />Over the weekend, Paramount Pictures International <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117987522.html?categoryId=19&amp;cs=1">went over the $1 billion mark</a>, reportedly thanks to the success of its distribution of summer blockbusters <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/iron-man/24396/main"><em>Iron Man</em></a> ($210 million), <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the/25440/main">Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</a> </em>($350 million) and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/kung-fu-panda/24474/main"><em>Kung Fu Panda</em></a> ($41 million), as well as earlier releases <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-spiderwick-chronicles/26297/main">The Spiderwick Chronicles</a> </em>($91 million), <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/cloverfield/30641/main">Cloverfield</a> </em>($90 million) and <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/no-country-for-old-men/25145/main">No Country for Old Men</a> </em>($86 million). Paramount is the first studio to reach a billion bucks in international grosses this year, and it did so faster than in 2007, when it didn't top the figure until late July.<br /><br />But is it really fair for Paramount to be bragging so much? <a href="http://weblogs.variety.com/thompsononhollywood/2008/06/paramount-hits.html">On her <em>Variety</em> blog</a>, Anne Thompson weighs in on the news, pointing out that all three of the studio's summer blockbusters were produced outside the main studio. <em>Indiana Jones </em>was Lucasfilm; <em>Iron Man </em>was Marvel; <em>Panda </em>was DreamWorks Animation. Of course, Paramount deserves a lot of credit for the marketing of these films, but Thompson wonders what it will be like if DreamWorks really does break away soon. Fortunately it has a good looking slate for the next few years, thanks to next year's toy-based titles <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/transformers-2/30589/main">Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen</a> </em>and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/gi-joe/30887/main"><em>G.I. Joe</em></a>, and then the next four or five Marvel Studios releases in 2010 and 2011.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/17/paramount-boasts-billion-dollar-b-o-overseas/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Paramount Boasts Billion Dollar B.O. Overseas</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117987522.html?categoryId=19&amp;cs=1>Read</a> | <a href=http://weblogs.variety.com/thompsononhollywood/2008/06/paramount-hits.html>Read</a> | <a href=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/world/news/e3idd8e051a07ea9f644c4f42988a26ef05>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/17/paramount-boasts-billion-dollar-b-o-overseas/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1227863/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/17/paramount-boasts-billion-dollar-b-o-overseas/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>indiana jones and the kingdom of the crystal skull</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull</category><category>iron man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>kung fu panda</category><category>KungFuPanda</category><category>paramount pictures international</category><category>ParamountPicturesInternational</category><category>the love guru</category><category>TheLoveGuru</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>George Lucas' WWII Movie Moves Forward</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/17/george-lucas-wwii-movie-moves-forward/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/17/george-lucas-wwii-movie-moves-forward/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/17/george-lucas-wwii-movie-moves-forward/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/war/" rel="tag">War</a></p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="191" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/08/tuskegeeairmen.jpg" alt="" />Late August was the last time <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/28/lucas-hires-writer-for-his-wwii-adventure/">we mentioned</a> George Lucas' <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/red-tails/30996/main"><em>Red Tails</em></a>, but considering the <em><a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/star-wars-episode-iv-a-new-hope/7512/main">Star Wars</a> </em>director has been wanting to make the film for decades, less than a year between reports is not too bad. Plus, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080617/ap_en_mo/film_tuskegee_airmen">the new AP story</a> about the film's preproduction couldn't come at a better time. People are currently talking about Spike Lee's upcoming African Americans in WWII film, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/miracle-at-st-anna/32635/main"><em>Miracle of St. Anna</em></a>, and <em>Red Tails </em>also focuses on blacks fighting in the war. Specifically it deals with the 332nd Fighter Group of the U.S. Army Air Corp., otherwise known as the Tuskegee Airmen, the first all-black unit of pilots, bombardiers and navigators. <br /><br />The AP story mostly features quotes from Tuskegee vets, who share their memories and their hopes for what the film will show. But there's also some minor updates courtesy of producer <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/rick-mccallum/1862563/main">Rick McCallum</a>, who's reportedly now scouting locations in the Czech Republic and Italy. He says that Lucas is hoping to begin shooting later this year or early 2009 and that the script by <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/john-ridley/1234566/main">John Ridley</a> (<em>Three Kings</em>) "balances difficult and painful issues with what is, at its heart, the story of men with a dream to fly and serve their country." So, apparently the script is finished, yet it's still unclear who will be directing <em>Red Tails</em>; the AP story almost seems to assume that Lucas will be holding the reigns himself.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080617/ap_en_mo/film_tuskegee_airmen>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/17/george-lucas-wwii-movie-moves-forward/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1227780/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/17/george-lucas-wwii-movie-moves-forward/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>george lucas</category><category>GeorgeLucas</category><category>john ridley</category><category>JohnRidley</category><category>lucasfilm</category><category>miracle of st. anna</category><category>MiracleOfSt.Anna</category><category>red tails</category><category>RedTails</category><category>rick mccallum</category><category>RickMccallum</category><category>spike lee</category><category>SpikeLee</category><category>the miracle of st. anna</category><category>TheMiracleOfSt.Anna</category><category>tuskegee airmen</category><category>TuskegeeAirmen</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Top 10 Highest-Valued Star Wars Toys</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/04/top-10-highest-valued-star-wars-toys/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/04/top-10-highest-valued-star-wars-toys/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/04/top-10-highest-valued-star-wars-toys/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comic-superhero-geek/" rel="tag">Comic/Superhero/Geek</a></p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="150" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/06/plush-darth-vader.jpg" alt="" />Happy birthday <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0076759/">Star Wars</a> </em>toys! 30 years ago, you came into our lives, and 30 years later, we're all kicking ourselves for not hoarding you away, keeping you in pristine condition and eventually getting rich by selling you to the highest bidder. Fortunately, there are more of you being made today and <a href="http://timesbusiness.typepad.com/money_weblog/2008/06/the-top-10-star.html">the London <em>Times </em>has declared</a> which of you recently released, still-cheap items are likely to go up in value. <br /><br />The spotlight is part of a list featured in today's Money Central section of the <em>Times</em>. Titled "The top 10 Star Wars collectibles," the list includes 30-year-old, super-rare action figures like Kenner's Darth Vader with double-telescoping light saber (currently valued at &pound;5,000-plus, or almost $10,000 US) and this year's Lego version of the X-WIng Fighter (currently sold for &pound;150, or $293 US). Coming in at #10 are the two-year old, "too cute" Galactic Heroes line of figures from Hasbro, which are currently only "the price of a rip-off sandwich" (&pound;3, or $5.86 US).<br /><br />Speaking of "too cute", I'm personally going for the plush SD Darth Vader (pictured) that the <em>Times </em>lists at #9. But I actually haven't learned anything from the past 30 years and so I'm going to actually play with it. Or use it as a stress reliever whenever I see articles telling us to invest in action figures. See, I believe toys are for playing with, comic books are for reading and collectibles made solely to be collectibles are a waste of space. <br /><br />For images of all the toys listed in the <span style="font-style: italic;">Times </span>article, check out the gallery below. I also included the unmentioned Galactic Heroes Darth Vader Unmasked toy, because it fits with the criticism that these toys are "too cute." What <span style="font-style: italic;"></span>person who'd seen <span style="font-style: italic;">Jedi </span>as a kid would have ever expected a cute version of the unmasked Vader/Anakin? <br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/10-most-valued-star-wars-toys/">10 Most-Valued Star Wars Toys</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/10-most-valued-star-wars-toys/841497/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/06/sd-darth-vader_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Darth Vader Super Deformed Plush" title="Darth Vader Super Deformed Plush" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/10-most-valued-star-wars-toys/841416/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/06/luke-skywalker-with-double-telescoping-lightsaber_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Luke Skywalker with Double Telescopic Lightsaber" title="Luke Skywalker with Double Telescopic Lightsaber" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/10-most-valued-star-wars-toys/841414/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/06/princess-leia-slave-figure_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Slave Girl Leia" title="Slave Girl Leia" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/10-most-valued-star-wars-toys/841413/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/06/millenium-falcon-vehicle_thumbnail.jpg" alt="1979 Millenium Falcon Vehicle" title="1979 Millenium Falcon Vehicle" /></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/photos/10-most-valued-star-wars-toys/841412/"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/06/lego-x-wing-fighter_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Lego X-Wing Fighter" title="Lego X-Wing Fighter" /></a></div><br /><br />[<a href="http://go.fark.com/cgi/fark/go.pl?i=3647326&amp;l=http://timesbusiness.typepad.com/money_weblog/2008/06/the-top-10-star.html">via Fark.com</a>]<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://timesbusiness.typepad.com/money_weblog/2008/06/the-top-10-star.html>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/04/top-10-highest-valued-star-wars-toys/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1215335/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/04/top-10-highest-valued-star-wars-toys/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>action figures</category><category>ActionFigures</category><category>collectibles</category><category>darth vader</category><category>DarthVader</category><category>star wars</category><category>StarWars</category><category>toys</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The Geek Beat: The Forgotten Sequel to 'Willow.'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/03/the-geek-beat-the-forgotten-sequel-to-willow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/03/the-geek-beat-the-forgotten-sequel-to-willow/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/03/the-geek-beat-the-forgotten-sequel-to-willow/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/the-geek-beat/" rel="tag">The Geek Beat</a></p><div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/06/shadowmoon.jpg" alt="" /><br /><br />
<div align="left">This week's column is about George Lucas, a long absent figure in the Geek Beat. If you find your blood pressure easily raised by even the slightest mention of his name, then skip reading this week. However, be assured that I'm not going to trot out any of the old Lucas clich&eacute;s; tell you he raped my childhood, or bring up that cringe-worthy site that analyzes his neck size. But I am going to examine one of his lesser known sins: the 1996 sequel to <em>Willow</em>. <br /><br />Thankfully, it was consigned only to bookshelves and not foisted on an unsuspecting movie audience. If you've never heard of it, be glad. And you're not alone, as it seems to have come and gone under the radar for most geeks. Which is a shame; it could have warned us that trouble was ahead -- like Lenin's letter warning against Stalin, or the iceberg warnings sent to the Titanic. <br /><br />Ah, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096446/"><em>Willow</em></a>. I didn't see it on its initial release, but rediscovered it as a pre-teen. I was enchanted by it in those days, when I was all about dragons, crystals, swords and the Renaissance Faire. (I've matured in my medieval tastes, though I still admire a well-made sword from time to time. I still have one hanging on my wall, actually.) Though I had read <em>The Hobbit</em>, I had not yet tackled <em>Lord of the Rings</em>, and so <em>Willow</em> struck me as relatively original. Now, of course, I realize it's a blatant rip-off of Tolkien ... but oh, the folly of youth. Plus, Val Kilmer was really handsome in the flick.<br /></div>
</div><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/03/the-geek-beat-the-forgotten-sequel-to-willow/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Geek Beat: The Forgotten Sequel to 'Willow.'</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/03/the-geek-beat-the-forgotten-sequel-to-willow/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1213557/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/03/the-geek-beat-the-forgotten-sequel-to-willow/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Chris Claremont</category><category>ChrisClaremont</category><category>featured</category><category>George Lucas</category><category>GeorgeLucas</category><category>Shadow Moon</category><category>ShadowMoon</category><category>The Geek Beat</category><category>TheGeekBeat</category><category>Willow</category><category>Willow sequel</category><category>WillowSequel</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>George Lucas' Daughter Can Kick Your Ass</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/02/george-lucas-daughter-can-kick-your-ass/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/02/george-lucas-daughter-can-kick-your-ass/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/02/george-lucas-daughter-can-kick-your-ass/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a></p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="240" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/06/amanda-lucas.jpg" />Before you continue bad mouthing <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/george-lucas/100308/main">George Lucas</a> for what he's done to your childhood, first with the <em>Star Wars </em>prequels and now with the disappointing <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/25440/main"><em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em></a>, you might want to worry that he'll send his daughter after you. Wait, what? Yeah, that's George's daughter, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0878741/">Amanda "Powerhouse" Lucas</a>, in the image on the right. She's a member of an American all-female MMA (mixed martial arts) fight team, and she's seen here duking it out with a Kiwi kickboxer during a recent Auckland, New Zealand-set event titled Princesses of Pain. And <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/4568248a1860.html">according to Stuff.co.nz</a>, footage of the bout may be featured in a planned reality series about the formation of a women's international fighting league as well as on the news program <em>20/20</em>. <br /><br />27-year-old "Powerhouse" Lucas appeared in all three of her father's <em>Star Wars </em>prequels, portraying the dancer <a href="http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Diva_Funquita">"Diva Funquita"</a> in <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/star-wars-episode-i-the-phantom-menace/5220/main"><em>The Phantom Menace</em></a>, "<a href="http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Adnama">Adnama</a>, patron of the Outlander Club" in <em><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/star-wars-episode-ii-attack-of-the-clones/10533/main">Attack of the Clones</a> </em>and <a href="http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Terr_Taneel">"Senator Terr Taneel"</a> in <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/star-wars-episode-iii-revenge-of-the-sith/17722/main"><em>Revenge of the Sith</em></a>. She also voiced a separate character in <em>The Phantom Menace</em>, Neimoidian communications officer <a href="http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Tey_How">"Tey How"</a> (she was credited under the pseudonym Tyger). Outside of the <em>Star Wars </em>films, she's worked as a hip-hop teacher and has spent years training in multiple martial arts, including kickboxing, Muay Thai and Brazilian ju-jitsu. <a href="http://www.tv3.co.nz/VideoBrowseAll/NationalVideo/tabid/309/articleID/57904/cat/41/Default.aspx#video">According to New Zealand's TV3</a>, Lucas lost her debut bout, but she did win a medal for "gutsiest fighter," and <a href="http://www.princessesofpain.com/sv/html/website/WebSite_30/m_main.jsp?page=home.html&amp;id=30&amp;">according to the Princesses of Pain website</a>, the whole match ended in a tie between Team America and Team Australasia, each winning 3 bouts.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/02/george-lucas-daughter-can-kick-your-ass/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1213175/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/06/02/george-lucas-daughter-can-kick-your-ass/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>amanda lucas</category><category>AmandaLucas</category><category>attack of the clones</category><category>AttackOfTheClones</category><category>mixed martial arts</category><category>MixedMartialArts</category><category>revenge of the sith</category><category>RevengeOfTheSith</category><category>star wars</category><category>StarWars</category><category>the phantom menace</category><category>ThePhantomMenace</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 18:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Inconvenient Measures to Combat 'Indiana Jones' Pirates</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/28/inconvenient-measures-to-combat-indiana-jones-pirates/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/28/inconvenient-measures-to-combat-indiana-jones-pirates/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/28/inconvenient-measures-to-combat-indiana-jones-pirates/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/paramount/" rel="tag">Paramount</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/rumormonger/" rel="tag">RumorMonger</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/distribution/" rel="tag">Distribution</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/exhibition/" rel="tag">Exhibition</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/steven-spielberg/" rel="tag">Steven Spielberg</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/trailers-and-clips/" rel="tag">Trailers and Clips</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="middle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/indy.jpg" alt="" /><br /><br />The nomadic DVD peddlers in Chinatown and other urban areas seem virtually unstoppable, but that hasn't kept Hollywood studios from launching various attempts to prevent movie piracy. <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/05/28/paramount-silencing.html">Boing Boing reports </a>on the rumor that at least one theater has been silencing the soundtrack in <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/25440/main"><em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em> </a>throughout the film in order to mess with potential bootleggers trying to record the thing. If true, it's got to be one of the most brain dead attempts at security since <a href="http://www.tsa.gov/press/happenings/9-25_updated_passenger_guidance.shtm">the rise of quart-sized bags</a>. When you really get down to it, most two-bit criminals with camcorders in their laps don''t really care if the quality of the movie they're recording suffers, since the resulting product will already feature lo-fi video, the overlapping sounds of laughter and other audience reactions, and silhouetted cameos from patrons venturing to the concession stands or taking bathroom breaks. With all that, the intermittent exclusion of music doesn't sound like a major concern for the bad guys. <br /><br />Studio anti-piracy measures are notoriously ill-conceived. Premieres and all-media screenings often force critics and even the filmmakers themselves to undergo intense evaluations before they're allowed to enter the theaters, while films open to the public, where pirates are more likely to show up, don't take any precautions. Granted, multiplexes wouldn't help their business if attending them felt like entering an airport terminal, but that doesn't mean there isn't a better way to prevent the crimes from taking place. Anyone care to offer some ideas?<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://moviecitynews.com/">Movie City News</a>]<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.boingboing.net/2008/05/28/paramount-silencing.html>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/28/inconvenient-measures-to-combat-indiana-jones-pirates/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1208510/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/28/inconvenient-measures-to-combat-indiana-jones-pirates/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>boing boing</category><category>BoingBoing</category><category>bootleg</category><category>bootlegger</category><category>bootlegging</category><category>criminal</category><category>criminal intent</category><category>CriminalIntent</category><category>criminals</category><category>harrison ford</category><category>HarrisonFord</category><category>illegal</category><category>illegal downloads</category><category>IllegalDownloads</category><category>indiana jones</category><category>indiana jones 4</category><category>indiana jones and th...</category><category>IndianaJones</category><category>IndianaJones4</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTh...</category><category>indy</category><category>indy2008</category><category>movie city news</category><category>MovieCityNews</category><category>multiplex</category><category>piracy</category><category>piracysolutions</category><category>quart sized bags</category><category>QuartSizedBags</category><category>security</category><category>security breach</category><category>security camera</category><category>SecurityBreach</category><category>SecurityCamera</category><category>steven spielberg</category><category>StevenSpielberg</category><dc:creator>Eric Kohn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 21:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Cinematical Seven: Things That, Thankfully, Didn't Happen in 'Kingdom of the Crystal Skull'.</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/27/cinematical-seven-things-that-thankfully-didnt-happen-in-ki/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/27/cinematical-seven-things-that-thankfully-didnt-happen-in-ki/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/27/cinematical-seven-things-that-thankfully-didnt-happen-in-ki/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/classics/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/steven-spielberg/" rel="tag">Steven Spielberg</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/cinematical-seven/" rel="tag">Cinematical Seven</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a></p><div align="center"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/ij4-ia-1666-dj.jpg" alt="" /><br /><strong><br /></strong>
<div align="left"><strong>Warning: This post does contain lots of <em>Crystal Skull</em> spoilers. Read at your own risk.</strong><br /><br />Whether you loved <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/tag/indy2008"><em>Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em> </a>or hated it, dreaded its arrival or could barely sleep at night in anticipation, I think we can all agree there are some things that we're really glad didn't happen. With George Lucas' oft-quoted desire for "wackiness," and with his <em>Star Wars</em> prequels being rife with mythology rewrites and well, "wackiness," there was cause for concern. I'm one of the individuals who didn't care for the film, but upon leaving, I knew it could have been a lot worse. My friends, who varied between loving, liking, and hating, agreed -- there could have been so many horrible things. For example, the much-maligned monkeys and prairie dogs could have broken out in a spontaneous and extended dance number, and the aliens could have appeared as Indy's father. So, this Cinematical Seven is the result of our roundtable rantings -- and, as always, I am anxious to hear your own ...<br /><br /></div>
</div><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/27/cinematical-seven-things-that-thankfully-didnt-happen-in-ki/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cinematical Seven: Things That, Thankfully, Didn't Happen in 'Kingdom of the Crystal Skull'.</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/27/cinematical-seven-things-that-thankfully-didnt-happen-in-ki/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1206498/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/27/cinematical-seven-things-that-thankfully-didnt-happen-in-ki/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical 7</category><category>cinematical seven</category><category>Cinematical7</category><category>CinematicalSeven</category><category>featured</category><category>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull</category><category>indy2008</category><dc:creator>Elisabeth Rappe</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 23:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Memorial Day Poll: Should They Continue the Indiana Jones Franchise?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/26/memorial-day-poll-should-they-continue-the-indiana-jones-franch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/26/memorial-day-poll-should-they-continue-the-indiana-jones-franch/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/26/memorial-day-poll-should-they-continue-the-indiana-jones-franch/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/diy-filmmaking/" rel="tag">DIY/Filmmaking</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/steven-spielberg/" rel="tag">Steven Spielberg</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/monday-morning-poll/" rel="tag">Monday Morning Poll</a></p><img width="433" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="289" border="1" align="middle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/indycs2.jpg" alt="" /><br /><br />Happy Memorial Day Weekend everyone! While I've been spending most of the weekend out at my imaginary mansion in The Hamptons, the rest of you were busy reserving just over two hours of your time for<a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/25/cinematical-indy-week-in-review/"><em> Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em></a>. We've already asked you <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/22/discuss-so-how-was-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-cryst/">what you thought of the film</a> (and we'll be asking again later to catch up with those who saw it at the end of the weekend), so now it's time to jump ahead and ask ourselves whether we want this franchise to continue. <br /><br />Both George Lucas and Steven Spielberg have said they'll <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/18/cannes-2008-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/">continue making Indiana Jones films</a> if the fans want them. Since Harrison Ford is getting up there in age, one imagines a fifth film would involve <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/17/shia-labeouf-to-take-indy-franchise-forward/">handing the franchise over </a>to Shia LaBeouf, though we don't know that for sure. What say you? Is it time to retire Indy once and for all? Did this latest installment prove there's not much gas left in this tank? Or, did you absolutely love the film, wonder why it took so long for a fourth one to hit screens and immediately ponder a wonderful future with lots more Indiana Jones-related films? <br /><br />Sound off ...<br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/26/memorial-day-poll-should-they-continue-the-indiana-jones-franch/#poll14706">View Poll</a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/26/memorial-day-poll-should-they-continue-the-indiana-jones-franch/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1205979/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/26/memorial-day-poll-should-they-continue-the-indiana-jones-franch/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>featured</category><category>george lucas</category><category>GeorgeLucas</category><category>harrison ford</category><category>HarrisonFord</category><category>indiana jones 5</category><category>indiana jones and the kingdom of the crystal skull</category><category>IndianaJones5</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull</category><category>indy2008</category><category>shia labeouf</category><category>ShiaLabeouf</category><category>steven spielberg</category><category>StevenSpielberg</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 12:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Cinematical's Friday Night Double Feature: Damsels Not in Distress</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/23/cinematicals-friday-night-double-feature-damsels-not-in-distre/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/23/cinematicals-friday-night-double-feature-damsels-not-in-distre/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/23/cinematicals-friday-night-double-feature-damsels-not-in-distre/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/steven-spielberg/" rel="tag">Steven Spielberg</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/home-entertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/trailers-and-clips/" rel="tag">Trailers and Clips</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/friday-night-double-feature/" rel="tag">Friday Night Double Feature</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/hamilton052208.jpg" alt="" /><br /><br />I wanted to continue <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/tag/indy2008">this whole week of Indiana Jones</a>, but we've already given you movies reminiscent of the classic adventure series, and we've already given you retro reviews for each of the three films. So, I started to think about what I like about Jones and my favorite of the three,<em> Raiders of the Lost Ark</em>. One of the best gems of that film is Marion Ravenwood. <br /><br />So, in celebration of how much Ravenwood rules, I wanted to celebrate women who are more than just damsels in distress. The might find themselves captured. They might get beaten down. But they don't wallow -- they fight back. And even better -- they're both old-school. One comes from the '90s, and the other first kicked butt on the big screen 31 years ago. I give you: Linda Hamilton's Sarah Connor in <em>Terminator 2: Judgment Day</em> and Carrie Fisher's Princess Leia in <em>Star Wars</em>.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/23/cinematicals-friday-night-double-feature-damsels-not-in-distre/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cinematical's Friday Night Double Feature: Damsels Not in Distress</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/23/cinematicals-friday-night-double-feature-damsels-not-in-distre/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1203836/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/23/cinematicals-friday-night-double-feature-damsels-not-in-distre/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Carrie Fisher</category><category>CarrieFisher</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>double feature</category><category>DoubleFeature</category><category>Linda Hamilton</category><category>LindaHamilton</category><category>Marion Ravenwood</category><category>MarionRavenwood</category><category>Princess Leia</category><category>PrincessLeia</category><category>Sarah Connor</category><category>SarahConnor</category><category>Star Wars</category><category>StarWars</category><category>T2</category><category>Terminator 2</category><category>Terminator 2 Judgment Day</category><category>Terminator2</category><category>Terminator2JudgmentDay</category><category>tough women in movies</category><category>ToughWomenInMovies</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 20:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Cinematical Seven: Favorite 'Indiana Jones' Moments</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/22/cinematical-seven-favorite-indiana-jones-moments/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/22/cinematical-seven-favorite-indiana-jones-moments/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/22/cinematical-seven-favorite-indiana-jones-moments/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/steven-spielberg/" rel="tag">Steven Spielberg</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/cinematical-seven/" rel="tag">Cinematical Seven</a></p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="top" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/indymoments.jpg" /><br /><br />Indiana Jones</em> is a franchise of moments. Some die-hard fans may recall the precise steps the hero took to locate and procure the Ark of the Covenant (i.e. the plot), but damn near everyone remembers "Snakes... Why did it have to be snakes?" The series is defined and embodied by individual flourishes, images and icons that stubbornly refuse to leave fans' minds, and sometimes even get stuck in pop culture as a whole. As for which ones, well -- that may be different for different people. This is a list of moments that represent <em>Indiana Jones</em> for me: the moments that always evoke a knowing smile or elevate the pulse; the moments I look forward to every time I watch. Some are obvious, some are not, and some of the obvious ones are missing -- but hey, make your own list.<br /><br />1. <em><strong>Raiders</strong></em><strong>: "Start the engine!"</strong><br /><br />Oh sure, most people would probably list Indy and Satipo navigating the booby traps of ancient temple to retrieve the golden idol in <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082971/">Raiders</a>'</em> deservingly legendary opening sequence. And yes, that's cool. But what I love even more is a moment that comes a few minutes later: with Rene Belloq and the Hovitos on his tail, Indy comes barreling across a plain, hollering at his companion to "START THE ENGINE" of a waiting seaplane. It's intense, absurd, exciting, funny: everything everyone loves about the series, in the span of a few seconds.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/22/cinematical-seven-favorite-indiana-jones-moments/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cinematical Seven: Favorite 'Indiana Jones' Moments</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/22/cinematical-seven-favorite-indiana-jones-moments/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1203270/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/22/cinematical-seven-favorite-indiana-jones-moments/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</category><category>Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade</category><category>Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheLastCrusade</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheTempleOfDoom</category><category>indy2008</category><category>Raiders of the Lost Ark</category><category>RaidersOfTheLostArk</category><dc:creator>Eugene Novikov</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 22:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Jeffrey M. Anderson's 400 Screens 400 Blows - How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Spielberg</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/21/jeffrey-m-andersons-400-screens-400-blows-how-i-learned-to-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/21/jeffrey-m-andersons-400-screens-400-blows-how-i-learned-to-s/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/21/jeffrey-m-andersons-400-screens-400-blows-how-i-learned-to-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/steven-spielberg/" rel="tag">Steven Spielberg</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/400-screens-400-blows/" rel="tag">400 Screens, 400 Blows</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/spielberg400jma.jpg" /><br /><br />Since it's <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/tag/indy2008/"><em>Indiana Jones</em></a><span style="font-style: normal;"> week, I wanted to do something Indy-themed for my column this week, perhaps something along the line of "</span><em>Indy</em><span style="font-style: normal;"> indies," but I kept coming back to an idea that has been gnawing at me for some time: a recently re-discovered appreciation for <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0000229/">Steven Spielberg</a>, flaws and all. As a kid, I was treated to Spielberg's childlike fantasies, including </span><em>E.T.</em><span style="font-style: normal;"> and </span><em>Raiders of the Lost Ark</em><span style="font-style: normal;">, and, to a lesser extent </span><em>Poltergeist</em><span style="font-style: normal;"> and </span><em>The Goonies</em><span style="font-style: normal;">. He, along with George Lucas, seemed to be able to tap directly into the universal fantasies of boys (and some girls, too) everywhere, thereby discovering a gold mine. <br /><br />But he eventually felt the need to grow up, not because he wanted to, but because he yearned for the acclaim that goes with making more grown-up movies. His first attempt, </span><em>The Color Purple</em><span style="font-style: normal;">, was oddly, almost uncomfortably childlike, but he eventually made the leap with </span><em>Schindler's List</em><span style="font-style: normal;">. At least three times he has jumped back and forth between childhood and adulthood in a single year: 1993 (</span><em>Jurassic Park</em><span style="font-style: normal;"> and </span><em>Schindler's List</em><span style="font-style: normal;">), 1997 (</span><em>The Lost World</em><span style="font-style: normal;"> and </span><em>Amistad</em><span style="font-style: normal;">) and 2005 (</span><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/06/30/rant-war-of-the-worlds/"><em>War of the Worlds</em></a><span style="font-style: normal;"> and </span><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/12/23/review-munich/"><em>Munich</em></a><span style="font-style: normal;">). It's only natural, then, that fans and critics began to see this as a kind of betrayal, or worse, inconsistency. Not to mention that his gargantuan success, both financial and critical, tends to breed contempt in others.</span>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/21/jeffrey-m-andersons-400-screens-400-blows-how-i-learned-to-s/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jeffrey M. Anderson's 400 Screens 400 Blows - How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Spielberg</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/21/jeffrey-m-andersons-400-screens-400-blows-how-i-learned-to-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1202135/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/21/jeffrey-m-andersons-400-screens-400-blows-how-i-learned-to-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>film</category><category>indiana jones</category><category>indy2008</category><category>movie</category><category>raiders of the lost ark</category><category>RaidersOfTheLostArk</category><dc:creator>Jeffrey M. Anderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 23:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Box Office: Jonesing For Indiana</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/21/box-office-jonesing-for-indiana/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/21/box-office-jonesing-for-indiana/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/21/box-office-jonesing-for-indiana/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office/" rel="tag">Box Office</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/steven-spielberg/" rel="tag">Steven Spielberg</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/box-office-predictions-1/" rel="tag">Box Office Predictions</a></p>Well, the <em>Prince</em> is certainly no pauper, but some expected the latest installment in <em>The Chronicles of Narnia</em> to have a more auspicious debut. <em>Prince Caspian</em> fell about $10 million short of the opening weekend figures for 2005's <em>The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe</em>. Still, the fantasy adventure was enough to knock <em>Iron Man </em>down a peg after two weeks in the number one spot. Here's the top five:<br /><strong><br />1. <a style="" href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-chronicles-of-narnia-prince-caspian/24862/main"><em>The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian: </em></a>$55 million<br />2. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/iron-man/24396/main"><em>Iron Man:</em></a> $31.8 million<br />3. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/what-happens-in-vegas/30164/main"><em>What Happens in Vegas:</em></a> $13.8 million<br />4. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/speed-racer-2008/28066/main"><em>Speed Racer:</em></a> $8.1 million<br />5. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/made-of-honor/28433/main"><em>Made of Honor:</em></a> $4.7 million<br /><br /></strong>Just one movie coming out this week, people, but it's going to be a doozy.<strong><br /><br /><a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/25440/main"><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/indy_boxoffice.jpg" />Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em></a><br />What's It All About: </strong>Indiana who? I kid, I kid. Nearly twenty years after the last installment in the series, <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/harrison-ford/24238/main">Harrison Ford</a>, <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/steven-spielberg/112325/main">Steven Spielberg</a> and <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/george-lucas/100308/main">George Lucas</a> join forces once again to regale the world with an adventure from the character who may damn well be the ass-kickingest action hero to ever grace the silver screen. <a href="http://movies.aol.com/celebrity/karen-allen/1033/main">Karen Allen </a>also returns as Marion Ravenwood, a character we haven't seen since 1981's <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/raiders-of-the-lost-ark/3348/main"><em>Raiders of the Lost Ark</em></a>, and Indy's young sidekick is played by Shia LaBeouf.<br /><strong>Why It Might Do Well: </strong>The film scored <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/indiana_jones_and_the_kingdom_of_the_crystal_skull/">79% at Rottentomatoes.com</a>, <em>Cinematical's</em> own <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/19/review-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/">Scott Weinberg</a> gave the film his seal of approval, and this is Indiana Freakin' Jones, people! I don't know about you, but last weekend's Indiana Jones marathon on the Sci-Fi Channel got me pumped and I am DYING to see this one.<br /><strong>Why It Might Not Do Well: </strong>The Connecticut Cadre of Kate Capshaw Kibitzers are threatening to boycott the film because Ms. Capshaw will not be reprising her role from <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087469/"><em>Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom</em></a>, but aside from them I think everyone's going.<br /><strong>Number of Theaters: </strong>3,900<strong><br />Prediction: </strong>$105 million<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/21/box-office-jonesing-for-indiana/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Box Office: Jonesing For Indiana</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/21/box-office-jonesing-for-indiana/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1201383/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/21/box-office-jonesing-for-indiana/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Cinema</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</category><category>Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheTempleOfDoom</category><category>Movies</category><category>Raiders of the Lost Ark</category><category>RaidersOfTheLostArk</category><dc:creator>Matt Bradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 18:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Indiana Jones and the Talk of the Internet</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/21/indiana-jones-and-the-talk-of-the-internet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/21/indiana-jones-and-the-talk-of-the-internet/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/21/indiana-jones-and-the-talk-of-the-internet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newsstand/" rel="tag">Newsstand</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/george-lucas/" rel="tag">George Lucas</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/steven-spielberg/" rel="tag">Steven Spielberg</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/home-entertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/movie-marketing/" rel="tag">Movie Marketing</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/remakes-and-sequels/" rel="tag">Remakes and Sequels</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/images/" rel="tag">Images</a></p><img width="211" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="150" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/indyant-(2).jpg" />While we here at <em>Cinematical </em>continue to pump out a series of Indy-related stories this week in honor of <em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em>, here's some of what else is being said about Dr. Jones around the web:<br /><br />Over at Moviefone, you can <a href="http://movies.aol.com/quiz-trivia/indiana-jones">partake in a pretty nifty Indiana Jones quiz</a>. Not only that, but they've also got a bunch of <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie-photo-bts/indiana-jones-crystal-skull-cast-quotes">groovy quotes from the Indy cast at Cannes</a>, as well as <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie-photo/about-harrison-ford-indiana-jones">20 fun facts about Indiana Jones</a>. Think you know everything about the man? Well, head on over and see if there's still more to learn.<br /><br />Right now on Rotten Tomatoes, they take a look at the <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/indiana_jones_countdown/news/1727717/">best of Harrison Ford</a>, Steven Spielberg's <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/indiana_jones_countdown/news/1728796/">best-reviewed films</a> and the super <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/indiana_jones_countdown/news/1728125/">career of George Lucas</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://blog.spout.com/2008/05/19/indiana-jones-and-the-backlash-despite-getting-mostly-favorable-reviews/">Spout ponders</a> why almost every early review of <em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull </em>includes a huge BUT in the first paragraph. <br /><br /><a href="http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2008/05/19/indiana-jones-toy-skull-functions-as-childs-projector-airport-landing-beacon/">MTV Movies Blog</a> has photos of an odd Crystal Skull projector that teaches you about archeology, as well as a remote control giant ant (see image to right). Yeah, for those times when that remote control Hummer is just too ... not creepy enough. (And when you see how the ants play into the new film, you'll be creeped out even more.)<br /><br />Who wants a <a href="http://www.xbox.com/en-US/community/events/indianajones/">limited edition Indiana Jones Xbox 360?</a><br /><br />Finally, Movieweb <a href="http://www.movieweb.com/news/15/28415.php">has a great piece up</a> on the top ten '50s films that influenced <em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em>.<br /><br />And for all of our coverage from <strong>Cinematical Indy Week</strong>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/tag/indy2008">just click right here</a>.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/21/indiana-jones-and-the-talk-of-the-internet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1199911/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/21/indiana-jones-and-the-talk-of-the-internet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>george lucas</category><category>GeorgeLucas</category><category>indiana jones</category><category>indiana jones and the kingdom of the crystal skull</category><category>IndianaJones</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull</category><category>steven spielberg</category><category>StevenSpielberg</category><dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 16:32:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>