<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Cinematical</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com</link><description>Cinematical</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright><generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>"The Movie Didn't Ruin the Book..."</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/18/the-movie-didnt-ruin-the-book/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/18/the-movie-didnt-ruin-the-book/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/18/the-movie-didnt-ruin-the-book/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sci-fi-and-fantasy/" rel="tag">Sci-Fi &amp; Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fine-line/" rel="tag">Fine Line</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/celebrities-and-controversy/" rel="tag">Celebrities and Controversy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/family-films/" rel="tag">Family Films</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/nicole-kidman/" rel="tag">Nicole Kidman</a></p><p><img height="150" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2007/11/comp.gif" width="150" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Everyone up to speed on <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-golden-compass/23389/main"><em>The Golden Compass</em></a> rhubarb? Claims are that the new film adaptation tends to soft-shoe some of the pretty clearly anti-fundamentalist religion elements in Philip Pullman's source novel. Here's <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/20/kidman-says-religious-content-of-the-golden-compass-has-been/">Ryan Stewart's <em>Cinematical</em> item on Nicole Kidman going public with the "watering down"</a> last August. Now, on <a href="http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2007/11/14/golden-compass-director-chris-weitz-answers-your-questions-part-i/">MTV's movie blog</a>, director <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0919363">Chris Weitz</a> reaches for a time-tested defense: "Philip Pullman likes to quote James M. Cain on this issue. Once, when somebody asked him if he was worried what a movie adaptation would do to his book, he said, `What do you mean? The book is right over there, on the shelf.'"</p>
<p>Now, let me digress for a second. The only time I ever met Allen Ginsberg (wonderfully played by David Cross in <a href="http://movies.aol.com/movie/im-not-there/23699/main"><em>I'm Not There</em></a>, BTW), I wasted my thirty seconds in his presence listening to the same comment regarding Cronenberg's <em>Naked Lunch</em>. When a sage like Ginsberg says this bit about the unruined book you listen. But here's other claimants: In the blog <a href="http://sergioleoneifr.blogspot.com/2006/03/movie-of-moment-v-for-vendetta.html">Sergio Leone and the Infield Fly Rule</a>, a correspondent is complaining about <em>V for Vendetta</em>, a film disowned by the source writer Alan Moore: "I keep meeting people who love this movie and my only solace in my bitterness after seeing what they did to Moore's brilliant work is a quote from the author himself:  </p>
<p>"Interviewer: 'How do you feel about Hollywood ruining your work?' <br />Moore: 'What are you talking about, they didn't ruin my work, it is right up there on the shelf.'" </p>
<p>Here, a person worried about <a href="http://forum.barrowdowns.com/archive/index.php/t-8827.html">the then-upcoming film of <em>Lord of the Rings</em></a> cites Stephen King as the one who knows where his unruined books are, right on the shelf; <a href="http://www.larryniven.org/ringworld_movie_news.shtml">here, it is Larry Niven calming the fears of those who feel his book <em>Ringworld</em> will be ruined as a film</a>. Just for good measure, from the Portland, Oregon blog "Book Pusher," is <a href="http://www.pdxguide.com/entertainment/entertainmentnews/ASAP11142007news1183658.cfm">a list of five good books that are waiting to be ruined</a>, and the best way to ruin them. Can you wait for the The Farrelly Brother's wild comedy <em>Me Talk Pretty Some Day</em> with Adrien Brody as David Sedaris (does the hero <em>have</em> to be gay)?<br />My point is: let's don't hear this time-worn excuse anymore. Here's one from Evelyn Waugh instead: "Each book purchased for motion pictures has some individual quality, good or bad, that has made it remarkable. It is the work of a great array of highly paid and incompatible writers to distinguish this quality, separate it, and obliterate it."<br /><br /><br /></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/18/the-movie-didnt-ruin-the-book/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1041883/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/11/18/the-movie-didnt-ruin-the-book/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Alan Moore</category><category>AlanMoore</category><category>David Sedaris</category><category>DavidSedaris</category><category>Golden Compass</category><category>GoldenCompass</category><category>I'm Not There</category><category>I'mNotThere</category><category>Larry Niven</category><category>LarryNiven</category><category>Naked Lunch</category><category>NakedLunch</category><category>Sergio Leone</category><category>SergioLeone</category><category>Stephen King</category><category>StephenKing</category><category>V for Vendetta</category><category>VForVendetta</category><dc:creator>Richard von Busack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Hollywood Fliering Useless Propaganda</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/10/hollywood-fliering-useless-propaganda/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/10/hollywood-fliering-useless-propaganda/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/10/hollywood-fliering-useless-propaganda/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/disney/" rel="tag">Disney</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fine-line/" rel="tag">Fine Line</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/lionsgate-films/" rel="tag">Lionsgate Films</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/mgm/" rel="tag">MGM</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-line/" rel="tag">New Line</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/paramount/" rel="tag">Paramount</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/paramount-classics/" rel="tag">Paramount Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sony/" rel="tag">Sony</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/sony-classics/" rel="tag">Sony Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/universal/" rel="tag">Universal</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-brothers/" rel="tag">Warner Brothers</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/warner-independent-pictures/" rel="tag">Warner Independent Pictures</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/focus-features/" rel="tag">Focus Features</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/20th-century-fox/" rel="tag">20th Century Fox</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fox-searchlight/" rel="tag">Fox Searchlight</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/dreamworks/" rel="tag">Dreamworks</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/home-entertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/miramax/" rel="tag">Miramax</a></p><img height="149" alt="http://www.cinematical.com/media/2006/03/pirateflag2.jpg" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2006/03/pirateflag2.jpg" width="151" align="right" border="1" />I'm not sure, but I think most of the movie pirates out there <strong>do not</strong> buy DVDs. But if they do buy DVDs in addition to all the burned or downloaded titles they steal, they're about to find out some horrible news: pirating movies is bad -- illegal even. New DVDs released this year <a href="http://www.dvdinformation.com/News/press/CES010707.htm">will include special inserts</a> supplied by DEG (Digital Entertainment Group) urging people to buy authentic DVDs rather than pirated copies. Again I'm not sure, but I thought the unavoidable FBI Warning message that plays before the movie already covered this ground.<br /><br />Isn't this like car manufacturers putting fliers in vehicles urging new auto buyers not to steal <em>other </em>cars? Why remind someone who <strong>just bought your product<em> </em></strong>to continue being a good consumer? It feels a little unappreciative to me. Even if the insert reads: "Thank you for buying this DVD and continuing to support Hollywood's efforts to entertain you," the honest spenders should feel a little annoyed. <a title="View MPAA Hates Film Piracy: Who Knew? on Cinematical" href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/03/14/mpaa-hates-film-piracy-who-knew/" target="_blank"></a><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/10/hollywood-fliering-useless-propaganda/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hollywood Fliering Useless Propaganda</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href=http://www.dvdinformation.com/News/press/CES010707.htm>Read</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/10/hollywood-fliering-useless-propaganda/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/732851/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/01/10/hollywood-fliering-useless-propaganda/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>anti-piracy</category><category>cinematical</category><category>DEG</category><category>digital entertainment group</category><category>DigitalEntertainmentGroup</category><category>film</category><category>hollywood studios</category><category>HollywoodStudios</category><category>movies</category><dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Hype begins for Prairie Home Companion</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2005/11/01/hype-begins-for-prairie-home-companion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2005/11/01/hype-begins-for-prairie-home-companion/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2005/11/01/hype-begins-for-prairie-home-companion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/music-and-musicals/" rel="tag">Music &amp; Musicals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fine-line/" rel="tag">Fine Line</a></p><img align="right" src="http://www.cinematical.com/images/2005/11/altman.jpg" alt="Robert Altman"/>As soon as <a href="http://www.imdb.com/company/co0158161/?fr=c2l0ZT1kZnx0dD0xfGZiPXV8cG49MHxrdz0xfHE9cGljdHVyZWhvdXNlIGZpbG1zfGZ0PTF8bXg9MjB8bG09NTAwfGNvPTF8aHRtbD0xfG5tPTE_;fc=1;ft=20">Picturehouse Films</a> president Bob Berney got done spending $3.75 million on the rights to
distribute <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000265/">Robert Altman</a>'s <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0420087/?fr=c2l0ZT1kZnx0dD0xfGZiPXV8cG49MHxrdz0xfHE9cGFpcmllIGhvbWUgY29tcGFuaW9ufGZ0PTF8bXg9MjB8bG09NTAwfGNvPTF8aHRtbD0xfG5tPTE_;fc=1;ft=6;fm=1">A Prairie Home Companion</a></em> (or <em>The Last
Broadcast, </em>or<em> Savage Love</em> - whatever it's called today), he immediately went
into promotion mode. Berney is telling anyone who will listen how
incredibly great the film is - he, apparently, "was blown away. It was
through the roof." Do you think that's president-speak for
"Off the hook"?<br/><br/>Wow, really? Why, this is shaping up to be a movie I
want to see. Tell me more, Bob. "This film is nostalgic and it's a
variety show. The cast and Altman make it very cool and hip at the same
time." Um, ok. Though it's not that common to convincingly put the
words "cool," "hip," and "variety show" that close together - just ask
<a href="http://abc.go.com/specials/nick_jessica.html">Nick and Jessica</a>. Do people who want nostalgia want to see <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0517820/">Lindsay Lohan</a>? What else is there to put my butt in the seat? Well, says Bob,
there's the kickass soundtrack. He was, again, blown away, especially
by "<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000658/">Meryl Streep</a> belting out these songs."<br/><br/>Don't get me
wrong here - <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066026/">MASH</a></em> is one of my favorite movies of all time, I love <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100873/?fr=c2l0ZT1kZnx0dD0xfGZiPXV8cG49MHxrdz0xfHE9dmluY2VudCBhbmQgdGhlcm98ZnQ9MXxteD0yMHxsbT01MDB8Y289MXxodG1sPTF8bm09MQ__;fc=1;ft=22;fm=1">Vincent &amp; Theo</a></em> and consider <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119196/">The Gingerbread Man</a></em> criminally
underrated. But Altman's fully capable of making massive stinkers -
everyone who sat through the deadly <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110907/">Pr&ecirc;t-&agrave;-Porter</a></em> can vouch for that. Plus, I'm just not convinced that pushing nostalgia, the young, hip cast, and Meryl Streep
singing (which she can totally do - see <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100395/">Postcards from the Edge</a></em> for proof) is going to get the movie attention for the right reasons. And the last time someone called <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0445087/">Garrison Keillor</a> "hip" it was 1962.<br/><br/>The
good new is that the film won't be released until the summer of 2006,
so Picturehouse has a lot of time to sort out how they're going to sell
it.<br/><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/11/01/hype-begins-for-prairie-home-companion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/39401/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/11/01/hype-begins-for-prairie-home-companion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Martha Fischer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 10:01:39 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>BREAKING: New Line Absorbs Newmarket, Berney Stays In The Lead</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2005/03/23/breaking-new-line-conquers-newmarket/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2005/03/23/breaking-new-line-conquers-newmarket/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2005/03/23/breaking-new-line-conquers-newmarket/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/executive-shifts/" rel="tag">Executive shifts</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fine-line/" rel="tag">Fine Line</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-line/" rel="tag">New Line</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/newmarket/" rel="tag">Newmarket</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="bob-berney.jpg" src="http://www.cinematical.com/images/2005/03/bob-berney3.jpg"/>New Line Cinema and HBO Films are about to strike a deal to acquire Newmarket Films, which they plan to absorb into indie division Fine Line. Newmarket president <strong>Bob Berney</strong> is expected to stay on board to lead the combined entity, which has yet to be renamed. The future of Fine Line's current staff is, at this point, unclear. Berney has had phenomenal success (at Newmarket, and first at IFC Films) distributing difficult-to-market pictures - <em>My Big Fat Greek Wedding</em>, <em>Monster</em>, <em>The Passion of the Christ</em> - that no one else knew what to do with.&nbsp; Fine Line, meanwhile, has been making a lot of critically acclaimed films of late - <em>The Sea Inside</em>, <em>Vera Drake - </em>but these pics have struggled at the box office. One imagines that Berney's presence is, thus, the key to the sale. More on this story as it develops.&nbsp;<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/03/23/breaking-new-line-conquers-newmarket/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/1237/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/03/23/breaking-new-line-conquers-newmarket/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Karina Longworth</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:10:09 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>